spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Banner spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Home Our Mission Tell the Press Tell a Friend Subscribe Donate subbannerbuttons spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image
See the highlights (pdf)

Who Really Represents Oregon?

Return to U.S. map

     Jump to the Details:

Meet Your Member

Oregon's Senators and Representatives
Member
District
Party
Term
Next Election
% of Vote Received
in Last General Election*
Overall Rank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N/A
R
2nd
2008
56.21 %
18
N/A
D
3rd
2010
63.39 %
71
3
D
6th
2006
70.86 %
167
4
D
10th
2006
60.98 %
409
5
D
5th
2006
52.86 %
249
2
R
4th
2006
71.63 %
203
1
D
4th
2006
57.51 %
144

[print friendlyprint friendly]


Don't know who your representative is? Refer to the House Web site.

* Source: Federal Election Commission. Some members listed as receiving 100% were uncontested.


K Street Cash

Contributions from Lobbyists

Lobbyists are paid big bucks to convince members of Congress to vote a certain way. They do this through meetings in which they lay out their point of view. They also sometimes provide members of Congress with expensive meals, golf trips and campaign contributions to ensure access.

In addition to the direct contributions detailed below, the “bundling” of contributions from individuals by lobbyists substantially enabled the rapid increase in political expenditures in recent years, which are not reflected in the chart. This chart is only the tip of the iceberg in documenting lobbyists’ influence through fundraising.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions
from Lobbyists, 2000-2005
Contributions from Lobbyists
Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Ranking
$ 294,105
$ 94,705
27
$ 106,329
$ 26,397
82
$ 91,325
$ 22,783
130
$ 87,972
$ 20,646
144
$ 56,675
$ 13,900
222
$ 43,650
$ 9,984
286
$ 37,950
$ 9,807
291

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2005.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


On Tour

Contributions from Individuals Who Live Out of State

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, yet many candidates for office receive contributions from people who do not live in their states or districts. Large amounts of out-of-state contributors may indicate that candidates are gearing up for a national election, that they are beholden to special interests located outside their state or district, or both.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions from Out-of-State
2000 Cycle to Present*
% of Contributions
from Out-of-State
Contributions from
Out-of-State Per Cycle (adjusted) †
Ranking
$ 1,947,033
52.40 %
$ 588,806
40
$ 1,674,391
40.60 %
$ 572,823
43
$ 2,278,867
63.60 %
$ 569,716
13
$ 278,922
21.00 %
$ 65,635
226
$ 251,113
17.60 %
$ 61,568
238
$ 212,259
19.50 %
$ 52,797
272
$ 78,350
29.00 %
$ 19,540
398

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* Contributions represent only those from individuals who gave more than $200.
† See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Fat Cats or Passing the Hat?

Contributions of $200 or less

When candidates are collecting dollars, it is easier to go to a relatively small number of wealthy donors who can write $2,000 checks than to gather many, many more small contributions from a large number of people. Candidates with many small donations likely reached out to a more economically and socially diverse group of citizens.

Federal election law does not require itemized reporting of donations of $200 or less. Members of Congress who receive more money from small donors, especially in proportion to their overall contributions, probably are turning more to their whole constituencies to raise money instead of to a few well-heeled supporters.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from Small Donors
Contributions from Small Donors Per Cycle (adjusted)*
% of Contributions from Small Donors†
Ranking
$ 2,646,653
$ 769,092
41.60 %
63
$ 2,777,879
$ 942,106
40.30 %
61
$ 499,057
$ 118,342
31.40 %
123
$ 802,420
$ 194,986
74.80 %
431
$ 1,090,749
$ 256,614
43.40 %
317
$ 1,408,985
$ 323,969
51.50 %
400
$ 2,242,616
$ 517,737
38.50 %
230

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.
† Percentage represents contributions from individuals of $200 or less divided by all contributions from individuals.


PAC-Men and PAC-Women

Contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs)

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, but often receive contributions from special interest organizations known as political action committees (PACs). PACs may give up to $5,000 per candidate per election and typically target elections in which their donations will have the biggest impact.

Some members included in our overall charts have stated publicly in news reports or other sources that they do not accept any PAC money whatsoever. PACs, which are the source for the data below, do not always report returned donations. The following members have indicated that they take no money from PACs: Senators Maria Cantwell (D.-Wash.), Herb Kohl (D.-Wisc.) and Mark Dayton (D.-Minn); as well as Rep.’s Hostettler (D-Mass.), Inglis (R-S.C.), Meehan (D-Mass.), Leach (R-Iowa), Osborne (R-Neb.) and Platts (R-Pa.).

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from PACs, 2000 Cycle to Present
% of Total Contributions from PACs
Contributions from Business PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Contributions from Labor PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Contributions from PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Ranking
$ 3,718,196
33.50 %
$ 1,178,425
$ 43,058
$ 1,261,822
3
$ 1,271,185
23.30 %
$ 261,885
$ 81,790
$ 381,062
78
$ 1,988,561
44.30 %
$ 294,509
$ 157,508
$ 491,560
93
$ 1,618,373
43.50 %
$ 374,931
$ 21,152
$ 401,286
158
$ 1,598,061
23.80 %
$ 150,411
$ 206,308
$ 398,123
161
$ 1,277,387
43.40 %
$ 132,688
$ 175,091
$ 320,675
244
$ 906,879
45.00 %
$ 78,457
$ 138,160
$ 226,738
346

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Return to U.S. map
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image
About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2013 Public Citizen
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image