spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Banner spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Home Our Mission Tell the Press Tell a Friend Subscribe Donate subbannerbuttons spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image
Printable Pamphlet (pdf)
See the highlights (pdf)

Who Really Represents New York?

Return to U.S. map

     Jump to the Details:

Scandals in Washington, D.C., have depressed Congress’s approval rating to near record lows, but there is hope for change, and four members of New York’s congressional delegation are at the forefront of the effort to clean up the House.

Reps. Joseph Crowley, Maurice Hinchey, Michael McNulty and Jerrold Nadler are co-sponsors of a key bill, H.R. 3099, the Clean Money, Clean Elections Act, which would provide full public funding for House candidates.

This report unearths the following facts about New York’s congressional delegation:

  • Nearly half of the members of the delegation rely on PACs for at least 40 percent of their contributions, including a half-dozen House members whose take from PACs tops 50 percent – Reps. Edolphus Towns, Nydia Velazquez, Gregory Meeks, Jose E. Serrano , John McHugh, and McNulty.

  • Eight members of the delegation get more than 35 percent of their contributions from individuals from out of state, including Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton at 55.4 percent and McHugh at an astounding 75.1 percent.

  • Most members of the delegation rely on small donors for less than half of contributions from individuals. These include Reps. Charles Rangel, Tom Reynolds, Gary Ackerman, Tom Maloney, Serrano, and Nadler, who each get 30 percent or less of their contributions from small donors. Only five of the 31 members of the delegation get more than half of their contributions from individuals from small donors: Reps. Brian Higgins, Carolyn McCarthy, Louise Slaughter, Randy Kuhl, and Hinchey.

  • Topping the list of K Street favorites are Clinton ($203,600 per two-year election cycle), Rangel ($107,285 per cycle), Sen. Charles Schumer ($101,994 per cycle), and Reynolds ($76,975 per cycle).

Certain categories of data were adjusted, as indicated, to account for the periods of time members served and overall increases in contributions since the 2000 election cycle. Some of the findings highlighted above reflect these adjusted figures.

Meet Your Member

New York's Senators and Representatives
Member
District
Party
Term
Next Election
% of Vote Received
in Last General Election*
Overall Rank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N/A
D
1st
2006
55.27 %
15
N/A
D
2nd
2010
71.16 %
16
5
D
12th
2006
71.33 %
220
1
D
2nd
2006
56.20 %
217
24
R
12th
56.89 %
48
7
D
4th
2006
80.94 %
100
17
D
9th
2006
76.15 %
134
13
R
5th
2006
58.99 %
141
27
D
1st
2006
50.67 %
310
22
D
7th
2006
67.16 %
418
2
D
3rd
2006
66.62 %
159
19
R
6th
2006
66.74 %
207
3
R
7th
2006
62.96 %
298
29
R
1st
2006
50.66 %
312
18
D
9th
2006
69.77 %
130
14
D
7th
2006
81.06 %
125
4
D
5th
2006
62.95 %
210
23
R
7th
2006
70.67 %
252
21
D
9th
2006
70.78 %
408
6
D
5th
2006
100.00 %
281
8
D
7th
2006
80.51 %
238
11
D
12th
94.03 %
389
15
D
18th
2006
91.13 %
6
26
R
4th
2006
55.63 %
17
16
D
9th
2006
95.22 %
373
28
D
10th
2006
72.61 %
402
20
R
4th
2006
65.83 %
65
10
D
12th
2006
91.49 %
160
12
D
7th
2006
86.26 %
217
25
R
9th
2006
90.39 %
170
9
D
4th
2006
71.32 %
385

[print friendlyprint friendly]


Don't know who your representative is? Refer to the House Web site.

* Source: Federal Election Commission. Some members listed as receiving 100% were uncontested.


K Street Cash

Contributions from Lobbyists

Lobbyists are paid big bucks to convince members of Congress to vote a certain way. They do this through meetings in which they lay out their point of view. They also sometimes provide members of Congress with expensive meals, golf trips and campaign contributions to ensure access.

In addition to the direct contributions detailed below, the “bundling” of contributions from individuals by lobbyists substantially enabled the rapid increase in political expenditures in recent years, which are not reflected in the chart. This chart is only the tip of the iceberg in documenting lobbyists’ influence through fundraising.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions
from Lobbyists, 2000-2005
Contributions from Lobbyists
Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Ranking
$ 615,700
$ 203,600
2
$ 254,996
$ 81,397
33
$ 397,652
$ 107,285
16
$ 340,818
$ 76,975
23
$ 219,500
$ 53,387
40
$ 164,618
$ 52,038
44
$ 191,041
$ 46,999
50
$ 76,151
$ 18,833
160
$ 68,541
$ 17,529
175
$ 69,801
$ 17,187
181
$ 15,250
$ 16,928
184
$ 67,754
$ 16,448
192
$ 63,195
$ 16,373
193
$ 58,350
$ 15,558
203
$ 61,300
$ 15,533
204
$ 56,000
$ 14,716
212
$ 33,250
$ 13,294
226
$ 11,086
$ 12,305
241
$ 38,220
$ 11,860
251
$ 41,150
$ 11,240
259
$ 46,900
$ 11,155
263
$ 42,250
$ 10,773
272
$ 40,700
$ 9,980
287
$ 38,707
$ 9,848
290
$ 26,900
$ 7,285
338
$ 21,750
$ 5,531
368
$ 17,250
$ 4,780
379
$ 14,861
$ 3,852
397
$ 10,750
$ 3,177
407
$ 10,250
$ 2,204
414
$ 7,150
$ 2,089
416

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2005.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Teeing Off

Acceptance of Privately Funded Travel and Related Expenses

Being a member of Congress is supposed to be a job, not a vacation. Yet lawmakers accept free trips all over the world. While some of the trips are legitimate fact-finding missions, others include golf outings and spa visits. Often traveling with Members are representatives of the special interests that funded the travel. Sometimes these companions are lobbyists, who can use charter flights and breaks between holes on the golf course to lobby members of Congress.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Privately
Funded Travel*
Yrs of Service†
Privately Funded Travel
(with years-of-service multiplier)‡
$ 60,001 to $ 70,000
4.5
$ 70,001 to $ 80,000
$ 20,001 to $ 30,000
5.5
$ 20,001 to $ 30,000
$ 140,001 to $ 150,000
5.5
$ 140,001 to $ 150,000
$ 130,001 to $ 140,000
5.5
$ 130,001 to $ 140,000
$ 90,001 to $ 100,000
5.5
$ 90,001 to $ 100,000
$ 80,001 to $ 90,000
5.5
$ 80,001 to $ 90,000
$ 40,001 to $ 50,000
4.5
$ 60,001 to $ 70,000
$ 60,001 to $ 70,000
5.5
$ 60,001 to $ 70,000
$ 40,001 to $ 50,000
5.5
$ 40,001 to $ 50,000
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
5.5
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
5.5
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
5.5
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
5.5
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
5.5
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
$ 20,001 to $ 30,000
5.5
$ 20,001 to $ 30,000
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
5.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
5.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
5.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
5.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
5.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
0.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
5.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 0 to $ 0
0.5
$ 0 to $ 0
$ 0 to $ 0
5.5
$ 0 to $ 0
$ 0 to $ 0
2.5
$ 0 to $ 0
$ 0 to $ 0
5.5
$ 0 to $ 0

Source: The Center for Public Integrity.
* As reported by members of Congress. Due to the imprecise reporting of privately funded travel, increments of $10,000 are used.
† The range of the available data is from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2005.
‡ The figure incorporates the years of service factor and extrapolates each member’s travel as if he or she had served all 5.5 years.


On Tour

Contributions from Individuals Who Live Out of State

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, yet many candidates for office receive contributions from people who do not live in their states or districts. Large amounts of out-of-state contributors may indicate that candidates are gearing up for a national election, that they are beholden to special interests located outside their state or district, or both.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions from Out-of-State
2000 Cycle to Present*
% of Contributions
from Out-of-State
Contributions from
Out-of-State Per Cycle (adjusted) †
Ranking
$ 27,545,130
55.40 %
$ 4,677,090
1
$ 6,390,355
28.60 %
$ 2,126,325
5
$ 2,407,790
47.70 %
$ 608,422
9
$ 2,116,436
35.80 %
$ 520,839
15
$ 652,859
42.70 %
$ 164,123
91
$ 555,191
14.20 %
$ 140,010
106
$ 548,059
21.50 %
$ 136,594
108
$ 530,863
30.60 %
$ 135,843
109
$ 527,028
31.00 %
$ 126,933
116
$ 356,388
22.70 %
$ 117,857
129
$ 354,251
17.60 %
$ 115,484
134
$ 419,533
18.70 %
$ 105,892
150
$ 406,450
24.90 %
$ 104,476
157
$ 400,886
22.50 %
$ 101,126
159
$ 376,295
37.10 %
$ 95,714
166
$ 368,673
35.00 %
$ 90,410
174
$ 302,000
41.80 %
$ 74,409
199
$ 287,350
15.00 %
$ 73,198
202
$ 274,100
9.0 %
$ 69,581
214
$ 263,670
15.80 %
$ 65,895
225
$ 258,801
75.10 %
$ 64,141
231
$ 241,288
29.70 %
$ 59,814
244
$ 225,840
23.40 %
$ 56,927
257
$ 102,834
11.20 %
$ 46,499
292
$ 153,942
15.70 %
$ 43,735
309
$ 85,850
14.70 %
$ 39,931
331
$ 101,150
25.60 %
$ 34,447
346
$ 104,736
12.20 %
$ 26,638
373
$ 93,500
31.70 %
$ 23,505
382
$ 87,232
15.80 %
$ 22,517
388
$ 82,435
20.60 %
$ 21,656
390

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* Contributions represent only those from individuals who gave more than $200.
† See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Fat Cats or Passing the Hat?

Contributions of $200 or less

When candidates are collecting dollars, it is easier to go to a relatively small number of wealthy donors who can write $2,000 checks than to gather many, many more small contributions from a large number of people. Candidates with many small donations likely reached out to a more economically and socially diverse group of citizens.

Federal election law does not require itemized reporting of donations of $200 or less. Members of Congress who receive more money from small donors, especially in proportion to their overall contributions, probably are turning more to their whole constituencies to raise money instead of to a few well-heeled supporters.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from Small Donors
Contributions from Small Donors Per Cycle (adjusted)*
% of Contributions from Small Donors†
Ranking
$ 9,857,270
$ 2,876,902
30.60 %
43
$ 35,744,220
$ 5,867,953
41.80 %
64
$ 471,477
$ 105,994
19.70 %
16
$ 676,423
$ 151,858
23.20 %
26
$ 1,550,998
$ 353,852
23.50 %
30
$ 655,682
$ 152,104
28.60 %
82
$ 2,511,618
$ 586,620
29.80 %
96
$ 125,320
$ 29,149
29.90 %
97
$ 1,845,445
$ 422,853
32.10 %
133
$ 745,377
$ 219,713
32.20 %
134
$ 1,452,279
$ 329,766
32.40 %
140
$ 374,194
$ 84,227
34.10 %
170
$ 1,444,043
$ 335,398
36.10 %
196
$ 863,676
$ 204,610
36.10 %
196
$ 962,994
$ 222,191
36.20 %
198
$ 1,022,496
$ 243,147
36.40 %
201
$ 209,394
$ 47,928
37.80 %
222
$ 257,574
$ 82,912
39.40 %
246
$ 532,456
$ 126,381
39.60 %
249
$ 1,157,660
$ 273,607
41.00 %
279
$ 734,575
$ 171,085
42.80 %
308
$ 783,120
$ 189,568
43.60 %
319
$ 1,559,394
$ 473,292
43.60 %
319
$ 325,986
$ 80,617
44.80 %
331
$ 886,903
$ 214,048
47.80 %
369
$ 967,305
$ 229,555
47.90 %
370
$ 972,801
$ 434,226
51.40 %
398
$ 608,845
$ 150,791
52.50 %
402
$ 702,489
$ 314,287
54.60 %
409
$ 1,080,046
$ 262,191
55.70 %
411
$ 3,499,789
$ 874,804
66.80 %
427

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.
† Percentage represents contributions from individuals of $200 or less divided by all contributions from individuals.


PAC-Men and PAC-Women

Contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs)

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, but often receive contributions from special interest organizations known as political action committees (PACs). PACs may give up to $5,000 per candidate per election and typically target elections in which their donations will have the biggest impact.

Some members included in our overall charts have stated publicly in news reports or other sources that they do not accept any PAC money whatsoever. PACs, which are the source for the data below, do not always report returned donations. The following members have indicated that they take no money from PACs: Senators Maria Cantwell (D.-Wash.), Herb Kohl (D.-Wisc.) and Mark Dayton (D.-Minn); as well as Rep.’s Hostettler (D-Mass.), Inglis (R-S.C.), Meehan (D-Mass.), Leach (R-Iowa), Osborne (R-Neb.) and Platts (R-Pa.).

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from PACs, 2000 Cycle to Present
% of Total Contributions from PACs
Contributions from Business PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Contributions from Labor PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Contributions from PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Ranking
$ 1,722,950
6.2 %
$ 444,063
$ 86,438
$ 563,477
52
$ 2,745,319
3.2 %
$ 250,487
$ 172,364
$ 461,557
63
$ 5,001,343
37.60 %
$ 1,140,830
$ 55,447
$ 1,216,980
10
$ 4,657,679
41.80 %
$ 902,194
$ 260,920
$ 1,184,329
12
$ 1,746,977
47.70 %
$ 361,508
$ 182,665
$ 583,274
55
$ 2,230,025
47.20 %
$ 318,264
$ 190,763
$ 549,567
67
$ 2,146,411
43.60 %
$ 443,986
$ 74,342
$ 536,538
71
$ 2,016,732
52.70 %
$ 416,319
$ 89,628
$ 515,061
79
$ 1,891,664
33.30 %
$ 351,233
$ 111,136
$ 474,452
103
$ 1,739,602
39.90 %
$ 418,074
$ 16,514
$ 437,514
128
$ 1,711,365
24.80 %
$ 185,057
$ 216,742
$ 431,954
130
$ 1,644,256
30.50 %
$ 211,173
$ 169,004
$ 411,049
148
$ 1,616,643
42.30 %
$ 216,801
$ 152,896
$ 408,758
150
$ 1,507,266
45.30 %
$ 319,510
$ 54,890
$ 379,174
182
$ 807,791
33.40 %
$ 87,759
$ 247,054
$ 376,510
184
$ 1,433,265
37.10 %
$ 236,999
$ 108,163
$ 363,571
196
$ 772,096
38.60 %
$ 272,583
$ 70,054
$ 359,758
201
$ 1,137,662
27.60 %
$ 92,409
$ 221,506
$ 355,711
205
$ 1,306,139
20.50 %
$ 147,201
$ 150,872
$ 330,400
231
$ 1,244,786
41.90 %
$ 206,863
$ 108,987
$ 317,611
247
$ 1,249,413
57.40 %
$ 216,517
$ 89,426
$ 313,237
252
$ 1,244,104
51.90 %
$ 219,025
$ 83,959
$ 309,348
257
$ 1,012,405
33.10 %
$ 119,814
$ 122,458
$ 256,479
314
$ 941,024
28.30 %
$ 107,372
$ 118,904
$ 241,552
330
$ 949,176
30.70 %
$ 107,259
$ 117,142
$ 239,387
333
$ 910,356
33.60 %
$ 87,292
$ 125,663
$ 233,490
339
$ 911,907
61.90 %
$ 131,821
$ 93,538
$ 225,852
347
$ 888,920
41.10 %
$ 84,282
$ 117,345
$ 223,129
351
$ 841,763
50.50 %
$ 111,907
$ 98,467
$ 215,741
359
$ 635,151
44.00 %
$ 45,990
$ 152,404
$ 215,380
362
$ 566,285
58.90 %
$ 49,792
$ 86,799
$ 143,160
407

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.

**These members have stated publicly that they do not accept PAC money. PACs, the source of these data, do not always report returned donations.


Return to U.S. map
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image
About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2010 Public Citizen
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image