spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Banner spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Home Our Mission Tell the Press Tell a Friend Subscribe Donate subbannerbuttons spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image
Printable Pamphlet (pdf)
See the highlights (pdf)

Who Really Represents New Jersey?

Return to U.S. map

     Jump to the Details:

Two members of the New Jersey congressional delegation – Reps. Rush Holt and Bill Pascrell– are cosponsors of a key new bill, H.R. 3099, the Clean Money, Clean Elections Act, which would provide full public funding for House candidates.

This report unearths the following facts about New Jersey’s congressional delegation:

  • Rep. Mike Ferguson received an average of $55,356 in contributions from lobbyists per cycle, ranking him No. 1 in the state delegation.

  • Rep. Donald Payne collected nearly half of his contributions from PACs, 49.9 percent.

  • Sen. Frank Lautenberg received 54.3 percent of his contributions from out-of-state donors, tops in the delegation.

  • Rep. Chris Smith, collected 63.6 percent of his campaign funds from small donors, by far the highest percentage in the delegation.   (Note: this calculation includes only contributions received from individuals.)

Certain categories of data were adjusted, as indicated, to account for the periods of time members served and overall increases in contributions since the 2000 election cycle. Some of the findings highlighted above reflect these adjusted figures.

Meet Your Member

New Jersey's Senators and Representatives
Member
District
Party
Term
Next Election
% of Vote Received
in Last General Election*
Overall Rank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N/A
D
4th
2008
53.88 %
69
N/A
D
1st
2006
75.85 %
44
1
D
8th
2006
75.00 %
51
7
R
3rd
2006
56.88 %
29
11
R
6th
2006
67.88 %
116
5
R
2nd
2006
57.57 %
271
12
D
4th
2006
59.25 %
182
2
R
6th
2006
65.09 %
155
6
D
9th
2006
66.90 %
110
8
D
5th
2006
69.46 %
152
10
D
9th
2006
96.88 %
278
9
D
5th
2006
67.53 %
95
3
R
11th
2006
63.44 %
53
4
R
13th
2006
67.00 %
420

[print friendlyprint friendly]


Don't know who your representative is? Refer to the House Web site.

* Source: Federal Election Commission. Some members listed as receiving 100% were uncontested.


K Street Cash

Contributions from Lobbyists

Lobbyists are paid big bucks to convince members of Congress to vote a certain way. They do this through meetings in which they lay out their point of view. They also sometimes provide members of Congress with expensive meals, golf trips and campaign contributions to ensure access.

In addition to the direct contributions detailed below, the “bundling” of contributions from individuals by lobbyists substantially enabled the rapid increase in political expenditures in recent years, which are not reflected in the chart. This chart is only the tip of the iceberg in documenting lobbyists’ influence through fundraising.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions
from Lobbyists, 2000-2005
Contributions from Lobbyists
Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Ranking
$ 212,478
$ 35,088
72
$ 27,700
$ 8,271
88
$ 188,354
$ 55,356
39
$ 154,676
$ 39,416
60
$ 124,474
$ 31,558
84
$ 86,132
$ 22,182
133
$ 73,729
$ 17,485
178
$ 65,300
$ 15,844
201
$ 63,261
$ 15,650
202
$ 46,980
$ 10,851
269
$ 36,200
$ 9,653
297
$ 21,000
$ 9,182
305
$ 30,850
$ 7,337
337
$ 13,990
$ 3,004
410

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2005.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Teeing Off

Acceptance of Privately Funded Travel and Related Expenses

Being a member of Congress is supposed to be a job, not a vacation. Yet lawmakers accept free trips all over the world. While some of the trips are legitimate fact-finding missions, others include golf outings and spa visits. Often traveling with Members are representatives of the special interests that funded the travel. Sometimes these companions are lobbyists, who can use charter flights and breaks between holes on the golf course to lobby members of Congress.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Privately
Funded Travel*
Yrs of Service†
Privately Funded Travel
(with years-of-service multiplier)‡
$ 40,001 to $ 50,000
5.5
$ 40,001 to $ 50,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
3.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 130,001 to $ 140,000
5.5
$ 130,001 to $ 140,000
$ 40,001 to $ 50,000
2.5
$ 100,001 to $ 110,000
$ 60,001 to $ 70,000
5.5
$ 60,001 to $ 70,000
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
5.5
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
4.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 0 to $ 0
5.5
$ 0 to $ 0
$ 0 to $ 0
5.5
$ 0 to $ 0

Source: The Center for Public Integrity.
* As reported by members of Congress. Due to the imprecise reporting of privately funded travel, increments of $10,000 are used.
† The range of the available data is from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2005.
‡ The figure incorporates the years of service factor and extrapolates each member’s travel as if he or she had served all 5.5 years.


On Tour

Contributions from Individuals Who Live Out of State

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, yet many candidates for office receive contributions from people who do not live in their states or districts. Large amounts of out-of-state contributors may indicate that candidates are gearing up for a national election, that they are beholden to special interests located outside their state or district, or both.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions from Out-of-State
2000 Cycle to Present*
% of Contributions
from Out-of-State
Contributions from
Out-of-State Per Cycle (adjusted) †
Ranking
$ 3,794,777
28.50 %
$ 624,592
37
$ 1,093,570
54.30 %
$ 372,073
67
$ 1,256,868
39.90 %
$ 309,501
32
$ 1,081,048
25.70 %
$ 268,311
45
$ 855,161
33.10 %
$ 216,137
62
$ 821,351
37.50 %
$ 203,033
70
$ 658,689
18.20 %
$ 170,989
87
$ 379,900
23.70 %
$ 131,197
113
$ 420,854
24.80 %
$ 105,051
154
$ 425,716
20.90 %
$ 103,789
158
$ 375,553
13.40 %
$ 92,127
169
$ 228,174
30.90 %
$ 56,495
260
$ 205,800
8.3 %
$ 51,137
275
$ 165,189
32.70 %
$ 40,698
327

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* Contributions represent only those from individuals who gave more than $200.
† See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Fat Cats or Passing the Hat?

Contributions of $200 or less

When candidates are collecting dollars, it is easier to go to a relatively small number of wealthy donors who can write $2,000 checks than to gather many, many more small contributions from a large number of people. Candidates with many small donations likely reached out to a more economically and socially diverse group of citizens.

Federal election law does not require itemized reporting of donations of $200 or less. Members of Congress who receive more money from small donors, especially in proportion to their overall contributions, probably are turning more to their whole constituencies to raise money instead of to a few well-heeled supporters.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from Small Donors
Contributions from Small Donors Per Cycle (adjusted)*
% of Contributions from Small Donors†
Ranking
$ 325,285
$ 97,286
13.90 %
10
$ 4,025,355
$ 612,927
23.20 %
33
$ 700,477
$ 157,839
24.30 %
36
$ 834,937
$ 188,114
25.20 %
43
$ 949,452
$ 212,784
25.30 %
44
$ 728,473
$ 166,098
30.00 %
98
$ 1,857,973
$ 422,842
30.60 %
108
$ 329,536
$ 75,122
30.90 %
112
$ 1,214,132
$ 290,793
31.90 %
129
$ 1,043,162
$ 237,853
33.80 %
164
$ 2,372,906
$ 576,935
39.60 %
249
$ 2,178,099
$ 513,869
40.90 %
274
$ 1,242,200
$ 385,515
43.70 %
321
$ 881,850
$ 216,854
63.60 %
422

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.
† Percentage represents contributions from individuals of $200 or less divided by all contributions from individuals.


PAC-Men and PAC-Women

Contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs)

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, but often receive contributions from special interest organizations known as political action committees (PACs). PACs may give up to $5,000 per candidate per election and typically target elections in which their donations will have the biggest impact.

Some members included in our overall charts have stated publicly in news reports or other sources that they do not accept any PAC money whatsoever. PACs, which are the source for the data below, do not always report returned donations. The following members have indicated that they take no money from PACs: Senators Maria Cantwell (D.-Wash.), Herb Kohl (D.-Wisc.) and Mark Dayton (D.-Minn); as well as Rep.’s Hostettler (D-Mass.), Inglis (R-S.C.), Meehan (D-Mass.), Leach (R-Iowa), Osborne (R-Neb.) and Platts (R-Pa.).

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from PACs, 2000 Cycle to Present
% of Total Contributions from PACs
Contributions from Business PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Contributions from Labor PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Contributions from PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Ranking
$ 598,650
13.70 %
$ 99,952
$ 78,133
$ 206,516
92
$ 3,667,927
18.50 %
$ 396,912
$ 177,740
$ 609,297
47
$ 629,365
33.00 %
$ 56,444
$ 86,383
$ 158,325
399
$ 1,035,631
49.90 %
$ 91,728
$ 161,321
$ 259,117
310
$ 1,169,184
36.60 %
$ 275,233
$ 6,613
$ 293,171
273
$ 912,409
24.30 %
$ 243,700
$ 1,965
$ 300,526
266
$ 1,393,251
33.00 %
$ 152,201
$ 191,876
$ 352,411
211
$ 1,502,065
20.80 %
$ 133,557
$ 212,338
$ 391,314
168
$ 1,596,909
33.90 %
$ 186,010
$ 185,931
$ 400,200
159
$ 1,619,146
38.30 %
$ 227,195
$ 172,823
$ 407,654
151
$ 1,627,774
30.80 %
$ 305,247
$ 87,545
$ 412,860
146
$ 1,678,659
38.60 %
$ 279,944
$ 129,677
$ 423,773
136
$ 2,034,032
36.50 %
$ 308,833
$ 179,258
$ 514,463
81
$ 2,648,308
27.90 %
$ 580,343
$ 51,413
$ 657,387
42

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Return to U.S. map
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image
About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2013 Public Citizen
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image