spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Banner spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Home Our Mission Tell the Press Tell a Friend Subscribe Donate subbannerbuttons spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image
Printable Pamphlet (pdf)
See the highlights (pdf)

Who Really Represents Maryland?

Return to U.S. map

     Jump to the Details:

One member of Maryland’s congressional delegation – Rep. Chris Van Hollen – has signed on as a co-sponsor of a key new bill, H.R. 3099, the Clean Money, Clean Elections Act, which would provide full public funding for House candidates.

This report unearths the following facts about Maryland’s congressional delegation: 

  • House Minority Leader Steny Hoyer received 56.6 percent of his contributions from out of state since 2000, averaging $599,558 per election cycle, the most among the state’s representatives in the House. Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes, who is retiring this year, received 67.8 percent from out of state, but his take was less than half of Hoyer’s, $233,576.

  • Rep. Albert Wynn relied on PACs for 56 percent of his campaign funds since 2000, averaging $361,735 per cycle. Hoyer got 51.1 percent of his money from PACs and averaged $1.4 million per cycle.

  • Hoyer tops the lobbyist hit parade, too, averaging $149,917 per cycle.

  • In contrast, Rep. Wayne Gilchrest ranked last in the delegation in lobbyists’ contributions, averaging $2,073 per cycle; in out-of-state contributions, averaging only $3,306 per cycle; and in PAC contributions, averaging only $18,456 per cycle.

  • Hoyer received a meager 17 percent of his contributions from small donors, less than all his Maryland colleagues. In contrast, Sen. Barbara Mikulski had the highest percentage, 62.6 percent.

Certain categories of data were adjusted, as indicated, to account for the periods of time members served and overall increases in contributions since the 2000 election cycle. Some of the findings highlighted above reflect these adjusted figures.

Meet Your Member

Maryland's Senators and Representatives
Member
District
Party
Term
Next Election
% of Vote Received
in Last General Election*
Overall Rank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N/A
D
4th
2010
64.77 %
72
N/A
D
5th
63.18 %
77
6
R
7th
2006
67.38 %
411
3
D
10th
2006
63.39 %
43
7
D
6th
2006
73.38 %
266
1
R
8th
2006
75.77 %
432
5
D
13th
2006
68.67 %
1
2
D
2nd
2006
66.62 %
246
8
D
2nd
2006
74.78 %
63
4
D
7th
2006
75.16 %
149

[print friendlyprint friendly]


Don't know who your representative is? Refer to the House Web site.

* Source: Federal Election Commission. Some members listed as receiving 100% were uncontested.


K Street Cash

Contributions from Lobbyists

Lobbyists are paid big bucks to convince members of Congress to vote a certain way. They do this through meetings in which they lay out their point of view. They also sometimes provide members of Congress with expensive meals, golf trips and campaign contributions to ensure access.

In addition to the direct contributions detailed below, the “bundling” of contributions from individuals by lobbyists substantially enabled the rapid increase in political expenditures in recent years, which are not reflected in the chart. This chart is only the tip of the iceberg in documenting lobbyists’ influence through fundraising.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions
from Lobbyists, 2000-2005
Contributions from Lobbyists
Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Ranking
$ 303,223
$ 78,169
38
$ 102,978
$ 42,581
63
$ 609,836
$ 149,917
5
$ 282,046
$ 122,663
12
$ 197,957
$ 36,222
71
$ 73,070
$ 18,099
167
$ 40,350
$ 9,054
306
$ 39,700
$ 9,018
307
$ 12,587
$ 5,699
364
$ 9,950
$ 2,073
417

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2005.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Teeing Off

Acceptance of Privately Funded Travel and Related Expenses

Being a member of Congress is supposed to be a job, not a vacation. Yet lawmakers accept free trips all over the world. While some of the trips are legitimate fact-finding missions, others include golf outings and spa visits. Often traveling with Members are representatives of the special interests that funded the travel. Sometimes these companions are lobbyists, who can use charter flights and breaks between holes on the golf course to lobby members of Congress.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Privately
Funded Travel*
Yrs of Service†
Privately Funded Travel
(with years-of-service multiplier)‡
$ 120,001 to $ 130,000
5.5
$ 120,001 to $ 130,000
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
5.5
$ 10,001 to $ 20,000
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
5.5
$ 30,001 to $ 40,000
$ 20,001 to $ 30,000
5.5
$ 20,001 to $ 30,000
$ 20,001 to $ 30,000
5.5
$ 20,001 to $ 30,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
5.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
2.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000
$ 1 to $ 10,000
2.5
$ 1 to $ 10,000

Source: The Center for Public Integrity.
* As reported by members of Congress. Due to the imprecise reporting of privately funded travel, increments of $10,000 are used.
† The range of the available data is from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2005.
‡ The figure incorporates the years of service factor and extrapolates each member’s travel as if he or she had served all 5.5 years.

** Traveler reported two trips overlapping on the same days.


On Tour

Contributions from Individuals Who Live Out of State

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, yet many candidates for office receive contributions from people who do not live in their states or districts. Large amounts of out-of-state contributors may indicate that candidates are gearing up for a national election, that they are beholden to special interests located outside their state or district, or both.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions from Out-of-State
2000 Cycle to Present*
% of Contributions
from Out-of-State
Contributions from
Out-of-State Per Cycle (adjusted) †
Ranking
$ 1,332,947
46.30 %
$ 395,749
64
$ 667,571
67.80 %
$ 233,576
87
$ 2,459,253
56.60 %
$ 599,558
10
$ 848,050
23.20 %
$ 289,388
37
$ 1,250,567
29.90 %
$ 206,779
67
$ 257,760
26.70 %
$ 64,378
229
$ 183,817
13.40 %
$ 62,290
235
$ 220,001
22.70 %
$ 52,481
273
$ 142,950
26.00 %
$ 35,494
343
$ 14,750
2.3 %
$ 3,306
431

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* Contributions represent only those from individuals who gave more than $200.
† See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Fat Cats or Passing the Hat?

Contributions of $200 or less

When candidates are collecting dollars, it is easier to go to a relatively small number of wealthy donors who can write $2,000 checks than to gather many, many more small contributions from a large number of people. Candidates with many small donations likely reached out to a more economically and socially diverse group of citizens.

Federal election law does not require itemized reporting of donations of $200 or less. Members of Congress who receive more money from small donors, especially in proportion to their overall contributions, probably are turning more to their whole constituencies to raise money instead of to a few well-heeled supporters.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from Small Donors
Contributions from Small Donors Per Cycle (adjusted)*
% of Contributions from Small Donors†
Ranking
$ 518,238
$ 176,498
34.50 %
51
$ 4,820,711
$ 1,404,716
62.60 %
96
$ 888,577
$ 200,686
17.00 %
9
$ 1,441,781
$ 232,543
25.60 %
47
$ 579,634
$ 174,928
29.70 %
95
$ 444,692
$ 100,271
31.60 %
127
$ 461,400
$ 104,045
32.30 %
137
$ 1,932,234
$ 613,596
34.60 %
173
$ 573,333
$ 135,538
51.10 %
396
$ 1,012,586
$ 244,643
61.10 %
417

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.
† Percentage represents contributions from individuals of $200 or less divided by all contributions from individuals.


PAC-Men and PAC-Women

Contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs)

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, but often receive contributions from special interest organizations known as political action committees (PACs). PACs may give up to $5,000 per candidate per election and typically target elections in which their donations will have the biggest impact.

Some members included in our overall charts have stated publicly in news reports or other sources that they do not accept any PAC money whatsoever. PACs, which are the source for the data below, do not always report returned donations. The following members have indicated that they take no money from PACs: Senators Maria Cantwell (D.-Wash.), Herb Kohl (D.-Wisc.) and Mark Dayton (D.-Minn); as well as Rep.’s Hostettler (D-Mass.), Inglis (R-S.C.), Meehan (D-Mass.), Leach (R-Iowa), Osborne (R-Neb.) and Platts (R-Pa.).

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from PACs, 2000 Cycle to Present
% of Total Contributions from PACs
Contributions from Business PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Contributions from Labor PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Contributions from PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Ranking
$ 1,391,740
20.20 %
$ 282,370
$ 106,850
$ 424,231
69
$ 856,245
34.80 %
$ 160,065
$ 112,652
$ 301,059
84
$ 5,670,680
51.10 %
$ 935,519
$ 410,241
$ 1,401,727
6
$ 2,404,677
30.10 %
$ 311,223
$ 78,227
$ 402,897
156
$ 1,422,952
56.00 %
$ 248,280
$ 107,030
$ 361,735
197
$ 1,066,421
17.50 %
$ 118,902
$ 192,325
$ 344,122
217
$ 963,062
36.30 %
$ 124,977
$ 176,114
$ 320,770
242
$ 1,180,299
49.20 %
$ 122,614
$ 157,458
$ 290,800
277
$ 375,514
27.80 %
$ 84,916
$ 711
$ 90,838
422
$ 80,187
5.3 %
$ 14,589
$ 994
$ 18,456
428

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Return to U.S. map
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image
About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2013 Public Citizen
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image