spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Banner spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image Home Our Mission Tell the Press Tell a Friend Subscribe Donate subbannerbuttons spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image spacer image
See the highlights (pdf)

Who Really Represents Florida?

Return to U.S. map

     Jump to the Details:

Meet Your Member

Florida's Senators and Representatives
Member
District
Party
Term
Next Election
% of Vote Received
in Last General Election*
Overall Rank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N/A
D
1st
2006
51.04 %
27
N/A
R
1st
2010
49.43 %
N/A
9
R
12th
99.91 %
199
2
D
5th
2006
61.65 %
225
3
D
7th
2006
99.24 %
281
5
R
2nd
2006
65.93 %
306
4
R
3rd
2006
99.55 %
323
11
D
5th
2006
85.81 %
318
21
R
7th
2006
72.80 %
201
25
R
2nd
2006
100.00 %
236
24
R
2nd
2006
100.00 %
47
16
R
6th
2006
68.04 %
54
13
R
2nd
2006
55.30 %
169
23
D
7th
2006
100.00 %
393
8
R
3rd
2006
60.52 %
101
14
R
1st
2006
67.59 %
320
12
R
3rd
2006
64.89 %
251
18
R
9th
2006
64.73 %
214
20
1st
2006
70.19 %
213
22
R
13th
2006
62.79 %
20
6
R
9th
2006
64.40 %
333
15
R
6th
2006
65.35 %
367
19
D
5th
2006
100.00 %
209
10
R
18th
2006
69.33 %
86
17
D
2nd
2006
99.59 %
262
7
R
7th
2006
100.00 %
120
1
R
3rd
2006
76.54 %
340

[print friendlyprint friendly]


Don't know who your representative is? Refer to the House Web site.

* Source: Federal Election Commission. Some members listed as receiving 100% were uncontested.

**Some Senators were not included in the overall rankings because complete data on contributions from lobbyists were not available for them.


K Street Cash

Contributions from Lobbyists

Lobbyists are paid big bucks to convince members of Congress to vote a certain way. They do this through meetings in which they lay out their point of view. They also sometimes provide members of Congress with expensive meals, golf trips and campaign contributions to ensure access.

In addition to the direct contributions detailed below, the “bundling” of contributions from individuals by lobbyists substantially enabled the rapid increase in political expenditures in recent years, which are not reflected in the chart. This chart is only the tip of the iceberg in documenting lobbyists’ influence through fundraising.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions
from Lobbyists, 2000-2005
Contributions from Lobbyists
Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Ranking
$ 277,659
$ 91,068
28
$ 23,700
$ 0
N/A
$ 187,595
$ 50,952
46
$ 134,129
$ 34,328
76
$ 137,414
$ 33,902
77
$ 57,350
$ 24,810
113
$ 98,500
$ 24,315
117
$ 53,434
$ 21,930
134
$ 58,500
$ 18,651
162
$ 68,569
$ 15,333
206
$ 13,550
$ 15,040
209
$ 45,725
$ 13,884
223
$ 45,346
$ 11,972
250
$ 24,952
$ 11,005
265
$ 35,396
$ 10,921
268
$ 23,100
$ 9,789
292
$ 23,843
$ 8,764
309
$ 26,598
$ 8,695
310
$ 27,050
$ 8,062
323
$ 30,600
$ 7,655
330
$ 27,000
$ 7,566
332
$ 33,633
$ 7,366
335
$ 29,227
$ 6,963
341
$ 6,650
$ 6,782
344
$ 19,936
$ 6,362
355
$ 26,927
$ 6,286
357
$ 24,535
$ 6,171
359

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2005.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.

**Some Senators were not included in the overall rankings because complete data on contributions from lobbyists were not available for them.


On Tour

Contributions from Individuals Who Live Out of State

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, yet many candidates for office receive contributions from people who do not live in their states or districts. Large amounts of out-of-state contributors may indicate that candidates are gearing up for a national election, that they are beholden to special interests located outside their state or district, or both.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Total Contributions from Out-of-State
2000 Cycle to Present*
% of Contributions
from Out-of-State
Contributions from
Out-of-State Per Cycle (adjusted) †
Ranking
$ 3,421,082
32.50 %
$ 1,009,247
23
$ 4,641,909
32.90 %
$ 778,691
29
$ 1,787,265
33.50 %
$ 589,708
12
$ 872,728
19.70 %
$ 223,335
56
$ 386,170
22.90 %
$ 171,967
86
$ 641,968
32.20 %
$ 155,086
99
$ 603,506
18.20 %
$ 150,778
101
$ 410,904
22.70 %
$ 138,701
107
$ 447,934
19.80 %
$ 113,213
142
$ 395,761
20.90 %
$ 105,026
155
$ 383,364
59.60 %
$ 95,858
165
$ 288,834
29.30 %
$ 91,373
171
$ 199,089
15.80 %
$ 90,867
173
$ 362,970
22.40 %
$ 88,102
179
$ 271,125
21.70 %
$ 68,643
216
$ 211,951
47.00 %
$ 67,295
222
$ 249,642
17.70 %
$ 59,125
245
$ 182,092
14.90 %
$ 57,614
254
$ 153,190
17.80 %
$ 50,840
276
$ 204,989
14.70 %
$ 48,926
281
$ 194,227
19.40 %
$ 44,008
305
$ 171,885
9.4 %
$ 42,651
314
$ 163,800
23.00 %
$ 41,548
321
$ 137,359
9.9 %
$ 34,068
348
$ 132,041
35.10 %
$ 31,847
354
$ 81,950
19.90 %
$ 27,640
369
$ 79,233
9.1 %
$ 20,447
393

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* Contributions represent only those from individuals who gave more than $200.
† See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Fat Cats or Passing the Hat?

Contributions of $200 or less

When candidates are collecting dollars, it is easier to go to a relatively small number of wealthy donors who can write $2,000 checks than to gather many, many more small contributions from a large number of people. Candidates with many small donations likely reached out to a more economically and socially diverse group of citizens.

Federal election law does not require itemized reporting of donations of $200 or less. Members of Congress who receive more money from small donors, especially in proportion to their overall contributions, probably are turning more to their whole constituencies to raise money instead of to a few well-heeled supporters.

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from Small Donors
Contributions from Small Donors Per Cycle (adjusted)*
% of Contributions from Small Donors†
Ranking
$ 5,895,579
$ 961,195
29.50 %
42
$ 9,925,382
$ 2,883,218
48.50 %
80
$ 302,575
$ 67,724
15.80 %
6
$ 397,423
$ 95,402
17.40 %
10
$ 651,322
$ 154,870
22.30 %
25
$ 395,900
$ 118,521
24.50 %
39
$ 635,956
$ 198,422
26.00 %
53
$ 1,560,976
$ 374,366
26.00 %
53
$ 756,173
$ 172,941
27.50 %
63
$ 245,381
$ 56,346
27.60 %
65
$ 478,124
$ 120,039
27.70 %
66
$ 274,077
$ 64,549
27.80 %
69
$ 733,884
$ 175,028
28.60 %
82
$ 360,253
$ 83,780
29.30 %
89
$ 529,552
$ 160,197
35.00 %
175
$ 758,683
$ 177,819
35.30 %
184
$ 1,833,889
$ 422,009
35.60 %
188
$ 523,803
$ 164,676
37.90 %
223
$ 269,678
$ 82,603
39.60 %
249
$ 790,286
$ 179,747
44.10 %
324
$ 1,129,564
$ 252,553
44.70 %
329
$ 1,062,473
$ 464,846
45.70 %
342
$ 381,800
$ 119,308
45.90 %
345
$ 1,306,426
$ 310,830
48.10 %
372
$ 360,858
$ 86,514
49.00 %
380
$ 1,661,768
$ 736,665
49.70 %
386
$ 6,637,054
$ 2,129,805
55.40 %
410

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.
† Percentage represents contributions from individuals of $200 or less divided by all contributions from individuals.


PAC-Men and PAC-Women

Contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs)

Members of Congress are elected to represent constituents, but often receive contributions from special interest organizations known as political action committees (PACs). PACs may give up to $5,000 per candidate per election and typically target elections in which their donations will have the biggest impact.

Some members included in our overall charts have stated publicly in news reports or other sources that they do not accept any PAC money whatsoever. PACs, which are the source for the data below, do not always report returned donations. The following members have indicated that they take no money from PACs: Senators Maria Cantwell (D.-Wash.), Herb Kohl (D.-Wisc.) and Mark Dayton (D.-Minn); as well as Rep.’s Hostettler (D-Mass.), Inglis (R-S.C.), Meehan (D-Mass.), Leach (R-Iowa), Osborne (R-Neb.) and Platts (R-Pa.).

[print friendlyprint friendly]

Member
Contributions from PACs, 2000 Cycle to Present
% of Total Contributions from PACs
Contributions from Business PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)*
Contributions from Labor PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Contributions from PACs Per Cycle (adjusted)
Ranking
$ 1,995,402
13.80 %
$ 543,209
$ 2,755
$ 592,065
48
$ 3,060,546
13.20 %
$ 370,628
$ 106,441
$ 521,644
55
$ 3,656,084
36.90 %
$ 895,832
$ 19,100
$ 938,538
17
$ 2,884,115
39.10 %
$ 677,700
$ 39,009
$ 731,757
33
$ 2,052,999
50.90 %
$ 419,866
$ 61,189
$ 505,189
85
$ 1,535,227
38.60 %
$ 474,576
$ 4,225
$ 505,178
86
$ 1,329,434
66.70 %
$ 433,627
$ 6,190
$ 447,742
118
$ 1,669,442
39.60 %
$ 384,756
$ 4,263
$ 427,970
133
$ 883,467
37.80 %
$ 205,939
$ 165,203
$ 406,017
152
$ 1,476,649
60.90 %
$ 356,481
$ 4,931
$ 369,521
190
$ 1,078,101
68.80 %
$ 269,058
$ 87,771
$ 360,875
198
$ 1,408,844
40.90 %
$ 334,824
$ 3,870
$ 356,660
204
$ 1,385,228
63.60 %
$ 337,082
$ 13,610
$ 353,703
208
$ 1,349,300
40.90 %
$ 310,785
$ 27,884
$ 342,231
218
$ 1,059,599
7.0 %
$ 306,163
$ 8,368
$ 339,627
219
$ 867,353
35.80 %
$ 250,489
$ 1,280
$ 275,778
290
$ 1,044,335
47.80 %
$ 81,228
$ 163,515
$ 267,405
300
$ 540,755
19.10 %
$ 229,547
$ 2,228
$ 247,498
324
$ 720,265
32.80 %
$ 177,507
$ 52,533
$ 241,446
331
$ 947,930
33.40 %
$ 172,071
$ 58,306
$ 236,286
336
$ 928,431
29.20 %
$ 220,615
$ 5,895
$ 235,874
337
$ 909,644
24.80 %
$ 121,438
$ 101,355
$ 231,660
340
$ 609,372
33.50 %
$ 111,977
$ 72,914
$ 198,836
375
$ 793,332
22.70 %
$ 113,215
$ 45,311
$ 196,757
376
$ 644,003
21.80 %
$ 151,019
$ 6,922
$ 162,369
395
$ 642,096
31.50 %
$ 59,793
$ 82,923
$ 159,506
397
$ 503,415
31.00 %
$ 120,921
$ 1,950
$ 128,773
411

Source: The Center for Responsive Politics. Figures are drawn from information for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 2006 and are based on data released electronically by the FEC on August 7, 2006.
* See Methodology for explanation of adjustment method.


Return to U.S. map
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image
spacer image
About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2013 Public Citizen
spacer image
spacer image spacer image spacer image